Banner
July 15, 2011
Waymon Hudson GoPride.com columnist

The Marcus Bachmann Conundrum
 

Dr. Marcus Bachmann, husband of ultra-conservative Republican presidential hopeful Michelle Bachmann, and his "pray away the gay" conversion therapy clinic have been blowing up the Internet on blogs and Twitter. The issue has rightly made it on to mainstream media news shows, looking into the serious issue of how damaging "ex-gay" therapy can be and the harm that someone like Marcus Bachmann does to people when they practice it in their counseling centers. It's an important issue and I'm glad it's getting the attention it is, yet something else more insidious in creeping into the conversion and threatening to derail the important main story of conversion therapy: speculation on Marcus Bachmann's sexuality.

The discussion has been moving from conversion therapy to how "gay" Marcus Bachmann seems. Jokes have been coming fast and furious as video of Marcus dancing around with his wife and tape of him talking with a heavy lisp have made the rounds. Late nights comedians, pundits, and bloggers have all latched on to the "Marcus must be gay" meme. It culminated in a widely circulated bit on The Daily Show where Jon Stewart and Jerry Seinfeld take turns trying to not "go for the easy gay joke," comparing Bachmann's behavior to Richard Simmons and going after his seemingly "gay" actions.

It was funny, but it also left me with a very uncomfortable feeling.

Making fun of Marcus Bachmann's "sissiness" or what some view as stereotypical gay behavior is the same thing that those that fight against our equality do. "Look- he dances really gay" or "that lisp makes him seem really gay" are both things that we would be outraged at as a community if it was used in a different context or directed at an ally or one of us in the media. Combatting the harassment over how someone acts is the main focus of many of our community's important campaigns and organizations. Fighting bullying, telling kids 'it gets better' and working for the right for people to be themselves free from oppression are main goals of the LGBT movement. Does that all go out the window because we find Bachmann and his work horrendous?

We're seeing that very real "he acted too gay" conversation going on in the Lawrence King trial, where they're using a "gay panic" defense in the murder of a young, gender-non conforming school kid in California. We see the real impact of the message that acting outside the expected norm or "seeming gay" is bad far too often, yet here many of us are playing right in to it.

Marcus Bachmann acts gay so let's tease and make fun of him. Insert any other name in that sentence and it would make you mad or at the very least uncomfortable. Shouldn't we be making room and fighting for people to act how they want and be their authentic selves- even odious people like Marcus Bachmann? Maybe if we did, he wouldn't have as many patients in his conversion "pray away the gay" therapy programs.

I'm all for poking fun of the ridiculousness and pointing out the hypocrisy of people who hurt our cause, like Larry "wide stance" Craig or George "carry my luggage rent boy" Rekers. But simply making fun of someone or attacking them because they "act gay" seems counter productive to our equality and our movement. There is the danger of the humor slipping from making fun of the hypocrisy and into just making fun of Bachmann's perceived "effeminate" actions. I've been called a sissy or faggot too many times to pile on someone who simply acts outside of what some people view as societal gender norms. Those who oppose us, like Marcus Bachmann, may think that certain rights are just for themselves, but I choose to think that we as a movement are better than that.

So let's shine a light on the horrible damage both Michelle and Marcus Bachmann want to do to the LGBT community through their political actions and ideas of ex-gay conversion. Let's fight them as hard as we can, pointing out their hypocrisy, small-mindedness, and bigoted views using our jokes, jibes, anger, and ire. But let's not let it slip into the making fun of stereotypes and behaviors instead of criticizing the important issues. Using "acting gay" as an insult and a way to tear someone down is what we are fighting and we should never lose sight of that.

POST A COMMENT
Login or Register or
Facebook Connect
  • photo

  • photo
Michelangelo Signorile also talked about this topic on his radio show. I happen to agree with you wholeheartedly. Talk about how his clinic is harmful, that his "science" is unfounded, or that you don't like his wife's politics, but like Congressman Aaron Schock, lets not label someone based on how they talk, dance or dress!!
  • photo
You know what? This guy has done immeasurable psychological harm to who knows HOW many men through his "ex-gay-but-you-wont-really-be-you'll-just-hate-yourself-more-later" therapy. So if the worst thing that happens to him is a few sissy jokes, he's still got the better end of that deal. Quit whining.
I think it's an important discussion to have, whether we agree or not. Debating issues isn't whining, in my book. It makes us a stronger movement.

my point it this: After the mounting flurry of jokes, innuendo, and comments that I saw focusing solely on Marcus Bachmann's perceived effeminacy, rather than the dangerous work he's doing as a "pray away the gay" conversion therapist, I felt like I needed to speak up. The real story and issues where being lost, as too often happens, in the salacious details and speculation over Bachmann's sexuality. Bachmann "acting gay" was becoming the butt of the joke, not the ludicrous nature of his and his wife Michelle Bachmann's views on gay people. While it important to combat our opponents using all the tools in our arsenal, including humor, sarcasm, and satire to expose their hypocrisy, we have to make sure we are doing it over the right issues and not playing into old stereotypes or sending a message that acting different is something to be teased about. We can't say to kids "it gets better, just be yourself... unless we disagree with you, then it's okay to tease you." It just seems like a contradiction that we needed to talk about as a community.

That's just my take on it.
  • photo
I agree, Waymon. Wholeheartedly. The difficulty with mocking Bachmann is not to his reputation, but to our integrity, our legitimacy. Stereotyping is not a useful tool, no matter to whom it's directed. And what difference does it make if Bachmann's motivation is self-hatred. His scientifically incorrect approach, and his smug self-satisfaction, and his wife's self-righteousness, are what are damaging, not their rationale per se. Their cognitively distorted thinking is the direct result of their religiously-based ideology, and whether he is gay or not — and his denial of same were it true — is his private pain.
Is'nt he an "ex-gay" himself? Since ones orientation can not be changed, only how we choose to behave or act on our feelings, then there is no such thing as "ex-gay". If he is gay then we are only making fun of one of our own. Maybe we are making fun of the fact he did not choose to "Butch up". While you have a point in that making fun of anyone for any reason is a bad thing and you are correct, it is hard not to throw a few zingers at a man that makes money on the backs of the very people he has caused to be self hating while he prances his gay self around in public.

Banner

The HomoPolitico

Featured Columnists
 

Banner
Banner
Serving the Chicago gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender communities.
© Copyright 2012 All rights reserved. Info on this site is strictly for entertainment purposes.
DMCA.com
 
show social bar
 
National
Chicago
close social bar
rss twitter facebook myspace linkedin google+